Why do job adverts list requirements nobody could meet?
Because job adverts are usually written as a wish list, not a specification — and understanding that changes how you should respond to them.
Why they end up that way:
They are assembled, not authored. A hiring manager lists everything desirable, HR adds standard requirements, and an old template contributes leftovers from a previous role. Nobody removes anything, because removal requires a decision and addition does not.
Anchoring. Employers ask for more than they need, expecting to compromise.
Filtering volume. For roles attracting hundreds of applicants, a long list is a crude way to reduce it.
Genuine errors. Adverts have famously requested more years of experience with a technology than the technology has existed, which happens when someone copies a list of tools and appends a standard experience figure to all of them.
Internal justification. Occasionally a specification is written around a preferred candidate.
What this means for applying. The widely cited claim that men apply when meeting 60% of criteria while women wait until 100% originates from an internal Hewlett-Packard observation and has been repeated far beyond its evidence base — but follow-up survey work has found a real pattern: the main reason people do not apply is believing they would not be hired, rather than lacking confidence in their ability.
The practical implication holds regardless of the statistic's provenance. Apply if you meet the core requirements, which are usually the first few listed and the ones stated as essential rather than desirable.
How to read an advert:
Essential versus desirable is the most useful signal, where given.
The first three bullets usually reflect what the job actually involves.
Named certifications and legal requirements are genuinely non-negotiable; years of experience rarely are.
A vast, incoherent list often indicates the employer has not defined the role — worth asking about at interview.