What is school refusal, and how is it different from truancy?
Anxiety-driven inability to attend, as distinct from choosing not to attend — and the distinction matters because the two need almost opposite responses, while the attendance register records them identically.
How they differ in practice:
In truancy, the child typically conceals the absence from parents, shows no distress about school itself, and is often elsewhere doing something they prefer.
In school refusal — increasingly called emotionally based school avoidance — the parents know, the child is at home and visibly distressed, the distress peaks on school mornings and eases at weekends and holidays, and there are frequently physical symptoms: stomach aches, headaches, nausea, which are genuinely felt and not fabricated.
What tends to sit underneath it: anxiety disorders, unmet special educational needs — undiagnosed autism or ADHD is a very common thread — bullying, sensory overload, difficulty with a specific subject or teacher, or something at home the child does not want to leave.
Why the standard response can make it worse. Attendance enforcement — warning letters, penalty notices, fines — is built for truancy. Applied to an anxious child it raises the pressure on a family already trying everything, and can escalate avoidance rather than resolve it.
What actually helps:
Identify the cause rather than treating attendance as the problem. Attendance is a symptom.
Involve the school early and ask specifically for a support plan, not just monitoring.
A graded return — partial timetable, a safe place to go, a named adult, a soft start — usually beats an all-or-nothing return.
Keep mornings calm and predictable, and avoid negotiating at the door.
Get needs assessed, because unmet need is so often the driver.
Involve the GP where physical symptoms dominate.
Do not let it drift. Longer absence is harder to reverse, and the longer a child is out, the more the return itself becomes the frightening thing.