What is a carbon border adjustment mechanism?
A carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) charges imports according to the emissions produced making them, so that goods from countries with weaker climate policy do not undercut domestic producers paying a carbon price.
The problem it addresses: carbon leakage. If one country prices carbon and its trading partners do not, two things can happen:
Production relocates to jurisdictions without a carbon price.
Domestic producers lose market share to cheaper imports.
In both cases global emissions do not fall — they move, while the country imposing the policy loses industry and gets no climate benefit. That outcome undermines the political sustainability of carbon pricing entirely, which is why leakage is taken seriously.
How a CBAM works. Importers must report the embedded emissions in covered goods and surrender certificates priced against the domestic carbon price. Where the exporting country already charged a carbon price, that is deducted — so the mechanism equalises rather than double-charges.
The EU CBAM is the leading example, entering a reporting-only transitional phase from October 2023 with financial obligations phasing in subsequently, alongside the phase-out of free allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System. It covers iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity and hydrogen — chosen as carbon-intensive and trade-exposed. The UK has announced its own, on a comparable basis.
The arguments for it: it preserves the integrity of domestic carbon pricing, removes the incentive to offshore emissions, and creates pressure for exporting countries to introduce their own carbon prices — since the revenue then stays with them rather than going to the importer.
The criticisms, which are substantial:
Protectionism. Several developing countries and major exporters argue it is a trade barrier dressed as climate policy, and WTO compatibility has been contested.
Equity. It applies the same standard to countries with very different historical responsibility and capacity.
Administrative burden, particularly for smaller exporters lacking emissions data.
Measurement difficulty for complex supply chains.