What is the difference between optical and electronic image stabilisation?
OIS moves hardware to counteract shake; EIS crops and adjusts the image in software. They address the same problem differently, and increasingly appear together.
Optical image stabilisation (OIS). Sensors detect movement, and tiny motors physically shift either a lens element or the sensor itself to compensate, keeping the projected image steady on the sensor during the exposure.
Its advantage is decisive for stills: it stabilises during the exposure, so it allows genuinely slower shutter speeds without blur. Nothing done afterwards can recover detail that was smeared while the shutter was open — which is why OIS matters most in low light, and why software cannot substitute for it.
Its limitations: it corrects small movements, not walking; it adds cost, bulk and a moving mechanism that can fail; and it can produce artefacts at very long exposures.
Electronic image stabilisation (EIS). The sensor captures a wider area than the final image uses. Software tracks movement between frames and shifts the crop window to keep the subject steady, discarding the margins.
Its advantages: no moving parts, no cost in hardware, and it corrects larger movements very effectively — including walking, which OIS cannot.
Its costs: it crops the image, so field of view is reduced and effective resolution falls; it works frame by frame, so it helps video far more than stills; and aggressive correction produces the characteristic floating or jelly-like look, along with warping when correcting rolling shutter distortion.
In-body versus in-lens stabilisation is the equivalent distinction for cameras: in-body (IBIS) stabilises with any lens attached and can correct rotation as well as shift; in-lens is optimised for that focal length and works better for long telephoto. Many systems combine both.
Hybrid stabilisation on phones runs OIS and EIS together, which is now standard and is why phone video is far steadier than it was.
What neither fixes: subject movement. Stabilisation counteracts camera shake only — a moving subject still blurs at slow shutter speeds.
A gimbal mechanically stabilises the whole device and outperforms both for video.