What is the difference between being arrested, charged and convicted?
They are three separate stages with very different meanings, and conflating them causes a great deal of confusion in news coverage and conversation.
Arrested means detained by police because there are reasonable grounds to suspect involvement in an offence. It is a low threshold — suspicion, not proof — and it allows the police to investigate: to question under caution, search, and gather evidence. Being arrested is not an accusation of guilt and often leads nowhere. A person may be released with no further action, released under investigation, or released on bail while enquiries continue.
Charged means a formal accusation has been made and the case is being taken to court. In England and Wales this decision usually rests with the Crown Prosecution Service, applying two tests: whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction on the evidence, and whether prosecution is in the public interest. Both must be met. A charge is a considerably higher bar than an arrest, but still an allegation, not a finding.
Convicted means a court has found the case proved — either the defendant pleaded guilty, or a magistrate or jury found them guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Only a conviction produces a criminal record and a sentence.
Between charge and trial the defendant is presumed innocent. This is a legal rule with practical effect: reporting restrictions apply, and commentary that risks prejudicing a trial can be contempt of court.
Related terms: cautions are out-of-court disposals that require an admission and appear on record without a conviction. No further action means the investigation has closed. Acquitted means tried and found not guilty — which is not the same as innocence being proved, only that the case was not made.
General information about England and Wales.