What is scaffolding in teaching?
Scaffolding is temporary support that enables a learner to do something they could not manage alone, withdrawn progressively as they become able to do it independently. The construction metaphor is exact — the scaffold is not part of the finished building, and leaving it up is a failure.
The theoretical basis. The term comes from Wood, Bruner and Ross, building on Lev Vygotsky's zone of proximal development — the range of tasks a learner cannot yet do alone but can do with support. Teaching is most effective when aimed at that zone: below it is unchallenging, above it is bewildering.
What scaffolding looks like in practice:
Worked examples, which have strong evidence behind them. Novices learn more from studying a fully worked solution than from attempting problems unaided — the worked example effect. Attempting problems becomes more effective as expertise grows.
Modelling and thinking aloud, making the expert's normally invisible reasoning visible.
Writing frames and sentence starters, providing structure while the learner supplies content.
Partially completed problems, with the learner finishing progressively more.
Breaking a task into steps and reducing what must be held in mind at once.
Questioning that prompts the next step rather than supplying it.
Checklists and prompts the learner eventually internalises.
The critical and frequently missed part is the fading. Support that is never removed produces dependence — learners who perform well with the writing frame and cannot write without it. The intended trajectory is model, then guided practice, then independent practice, with the teacher deliberately withdrawing at each stage.
The expertise reversal effect is the reason this matters: support that helps a novice actively hinders a more expert learner, because processing redundant guidance consumes working memory. So scaffolding must be matched to current ability and removed as it grows.
Differentiation often means scaffolding differently rather than setting different work.