Question

What is EBITDA, and why is it criticised?

Vault Verified
Curated Intelligence
Definitive Source
Answer

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. It strips four things out of profit to give a figure intended to show operating performance independent of financing and accounting choices — and it is either useful or misleading depending entirely on what you do with it.

What each exclusion is for:

Interest — depends on how the business is financed, not how it trades. Two identical businesses, one debt-funded, one not, differ here for reasons unrelated to operations.

Tax — depends on jurisdiction, structure and historic losses.

Depreciation and amortisation — non-cash charges spreading the cost of assets bought previously. They reflect accounting policy and past decisions rather than this period's trading.

Why it became standard. It allows comparison between companies with different capital structures, tax positions and asset bases, and it is used as a rough proxy for operating cash generation. Business valuations are frequently expressed as a multiple of EBITDA, so it matters directly when buying or selling a company.

The criticisms, which are serious:

Depreciation represents real costs. Equipment wears out and must be replaced. Excluding it treats a capital-intensive business as though its assets were free. Charlie Munger's remark that it should be read as "bullshit earnings" captures the objection; Warren Buffett has made the same point about management preferring a measure that ignores the cost of the machines they need.

It is not a cash flow measure, despite being used as one. It ignores working capital movements entirely — a business with soaring EBITDA and collapsing cash is an entirely coherent situation.

Interest is a real obligation. Excluding it makes a heavily indebted business look healthier than it is, which is precisely why highly leveraged businesses favour it.

It is not a defined accounting standard, so companies calculate it differently.

"Adjusted EBITDA" deserves particular scepticism. Further add-backs for restructuring, share-based payment, or "exceptional" items that recur annually can be legitimate or can be a way of excluding anything unflattering. Always read what was adjusted.

General information, not financial advice.

Related Questions