What are anchoring, charm pricing and the decoy effect?
Three well-documented ways in which the presentation of a price changes how it is judged — because people evaluate prices comparatively, not absolutely, and have no independent sense of what most things should cost.
Anchoring. The first number seen becomes the reference point everything else is judged against. A £200 item shown beside a £500 one is evaluated as cheap; the same item alone is evaluated on its merits. This is why a recommended retail price is shown next to a sale price, why menus place an expensive item prominently, and why the highest tier of a pricing page exists even when few buy it.
Anchors work even when obviously arbitrary, which is what makes the effect notable — experiments find irrelevant numbers shifting subsequent valuations.
Charm pricing. Prices ending in 9 or 99. The usual explanation is left-digit truncation: £4.99 is encoded starting from the 4, and the perceived difference from £5.00 exceeds one penny. Evidence supports real effects on demand, though they vary by category.
The counter-effect matters: 9-endings also signal discount and value, which is why premium brands avoid them — a £5,000 watch priced at £4,999 reads as cheap in the wrong way. Round numbers signal quality and simplicity, and are used deliberately in luxury.
The decoy effect (asymmetric dominance). Adding a third option that is clearly worse than one option but not the other shifts choice toward the one that dominates it. The classic demonstration: a small popcorn and a large popcorn split choices; add a medium priced just below the large, and the large's share rises sharply — because the large is now visibly better value than something.
Why this matters even if you never set prices. It works on you, and the defence is to establish your own reference point before looking — decide what the thing is worth to you, or check an independent price, before the seller's framing supplies one.
Regulators police the boundary: fake reference prices and misleading was/now claims are unlawful.