Does the broadsheet and tabloid distinction still mean anything?
The physical distinction has largely disappeared. The editorial distinction it stood for persists, though imperfectly, and the vocabulary has shifted to reflect that.
The original meaning was literally page size. Broadsheets were large-format papers; tabloids were half that size. The formats carried strong associations: broadsheets with detailed political and international coverage aimed at a professional readership; tabloids with celebrity, sport, crime and human interest, shorter articles and larger headlines.
Why the physical distinction collapsed. From around 2003, several British broadsheets changed format for practical reasons — a large sheet is awkward to read on public transport. The Independent and The Times moved to tabloid size, The Guardian to Berliner and later tabloid. They insisted the editorial approach was unchanged, and broadly it was.
This forced new terminology: quality press, mid-market and red top, referring to the red masthead of the most popular titles.
What the underlying distinction still describes:
Story selection — proportion of political, international and financial coverage against celebrity, crime and human interest.
Article length and complexity.
Headline style and the use of wordplay.
Sourcing conventions and the weight given to single-source stories.
Regulatory record, with complaint volumes differing markedly between titles.
Why it has become less useful:
Digital publishing collapsed the format entirely. Online, every outlet is the same shape, and the same publisher may run serious investigations alongside celebrity content on the same homepage.
Quality titles adopted popular tactics for traffic, including sidebar celebrity content.
Some tabloids do substantial investigative work, and the assumption that popular equals unreliable is not supportable.
Social distribution strips masthead context entirely — a shared link carries no format signal.
The class connotation always did work the format description did not, and it is worth being honest that the distinction carried social judgement as much as editorial description.
Judge by the individual piece — sourcing, attribution and whether claims are checkable.